Reading: Shell Global Scenarios to 2025

Loaned to me from a strategic thinking friend, Shell Global Scenarios is a hefty, yet easy to read analysis of really big (mega-) trends over the 15 year time horizon.

There is lots to think about; their three forces (market incentives, community, coercion/regulation) and how there are “two wins, one loss” out of the choices.

In similar quadrants, there are three objectives of societies (efficiency, social cohesion, security). Again the same choice matrix appears to describe a society. From forces and objectives appear Open Door, Flags and Low-trust Globalisation groupings. All of this MBA-level pretty pictures and frameworks leads down interesting paths, and coming from Shell there is a consideration of energy needs; however this is not the primary focus.

On page 120 (section 6f) the power of “Netizens” is detailed. A case example of Chinese regulations changing based on internet-based activism. The recent anti-Japanese sentiment, a negative rather than positive outcome, sourced from netizens in China is shown.

Most telling is a quotation from Izumi Aizo of the Institute of Hypernetwork Society in Tokyo:

“Mobile technology is a source of fundamental change – meaning the capacity to be connected whenever and whereever. This enables people to act immediately, either politically or socially. It is still too early to indentity the full consequences of this phenomenon, but it can be a major source of changes in the relation of people to each other. It already has a major impact on Islamic counties like Iran, Afghanistan and others.”

The same pull-out details a summary of what we netizens are in the midst of right now, and I will paraphrase: the struggle for information power. The old institutions wish to put the internet genie back into its bottle, to regain the power. Filtering, File-sharing, patents and copyrights battles are proxies skirmishes in a much larger, cultural war.

A possible governing principle will be self-regulation, with bottom-up standard setting.

Off My Soapbox of Self Righteousness

I love throwing words and venacular phrases together. This stems from the power of Split Enz to create visual imagery from common sayings. An extreme example: Another Great Divide (Judd/Finn/Rayner/Gillies)

Now how can I figure this equation, if multiplication’s the rule /
You keep subtracting me from you, and it just doesn’t add up at all

It should be further noted that there is always a Finn song for every occasion. Thanks @mediamum!

In the instance of Off My Soapbox of Self Righteousness, relates to battles and discussions that rage daily. Like all family dirty laundry, the exact nature will remain confidential.

But on a larger scale, it is my opinion that social media (whatever that is) is being misunderstood; or worse, mis-used by various less Cluetrained people. My fear is that the forces of oldskool will water down the potential for massive change that is blossoming. There are skirmishes being fought daily. The wider community does not see nor hear of these.

Sadly, those on the internal firing line are also copping friendly fire. Just sayin’

The strangeness is made more fictional when I have an internal voice that is shouting, not whispering, you’re also doing it wrong. There is a high-wire act going on in my head, and the fingers of sanity may be slowly letting go.

Microsoft and Open Source, Unhandled Exceptions. Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane

Microsoft and Open Source, Unhandled Exceptions.

Microsoft and Open source? Isn’t that like cats and dogs living together? Discuss and learn what (where and why) Microsoft is embracing Open source. See which Microsoft technology can positively affect your Open source based projects, and how you can contribute. We would also like to hear your unfiltered feedback on how we should contribute, too. Come along, bring your colleagues, have some light refreshments and enjoy a relaxed conversation.

At the recent WebDU conference, Jorke and I sat down with two groups of attendees to hear warts-and-all, on the ground stories. Simple questions and deep answers provided an insight that a PowerPoint (or Keynote) presentation gives. Listening hurts, hard.

Extending this into open source evenings seems like a good way to go. No need to shill open source.

Register an pop along. Vent at us in more than 140 characters. See you there.

ReMIX: 11th June

Microsoft ReMIX 2009 is being held on the 11th June at Star City, Sydney. The early-bird cheaper price ticket stuff has been extended, too.

At 4.45pm, I will be hosting a session "Sibling Rivalry or Love: Microsoft and Open source. – Nick Hodge and Friends"

Microsoft and Open source may not be identical twins, but they share an equal passion for software. A common parentage if you will: the code. Open source projects are popping up in many Microsoft’s web projects: from the adoption of jQuery to the ASP.NET MVC project.

In this session, you will discover Microsoft’s Open source offspring and the not-so-distant cousins. See which projects fit into your plans, and can dramatically improve your time-to-golive. Also, hear from local contributors to open source projects: the risk and the rewards of joining a large genetically diverse family.

By sharing in-the-field experience and anecdotes, Nick Hodge will act as a family counselor: and bring the family back together for a ReMIX reunion.

This year, the friends include:

  • John O’Brien
  • Rich Buggy
  • John BouAntoun
  • Lachlan Hardy
  • Tatham Oddie

See you at ReMIX.

atNickHodge Episode 12: Mark Pesce

The future is intangible. It fascinates us all. In this episode of atNickHodge, I interview Mark Pesce.

If we could get someone to read us our future, with certainty, we would certainly leap at the chance. It impacts the lowest base needs of our Maslowian needs of security and safety. Knowing the future provides a comfort to our present.

Ultimately, the future may be the only thing we humans cannot touch, cannot see, cannot measure; and for the masses, cannot directly effect.

The role of a futurist is a modern day equivalent of a celtic druid; an indian shaman. The gypsy fortune teller. Someone who sees the present through different glasses and extrapolates a non-Wolframic line of potentiality. Somewhere that is now known, in the present mind.

But by the sheer act of shining a light in one dim corner of a future; the cockroaches scuttle out; and there is a potential that the futurist has Heisenberg’d that reality.

A futurist has a challenging act. In a small way a court’s jester: not to be the clown: but rather the only one freely permitted to speak their mind. Call the present for what it is – and to determine the health of Schroedinger’s cat . In what dramatic ways will the present change a potential future.

Risk can be described as the myriad of things can happen, which is more than was eventually does happen. Knowing the future reduces risk, or detailing a future helps tickle out the potential futures. Good and bad.

Futurists, such as Mark, have this responsibility to shake up the people and power in the present. Ensure that a negative future is averted as we journey down the dirty path of now within the dark forest of reality.

Stilgherrian in Africa: Project Toto

The most important event in “social media” (such a naff and trite phrase in this context) this year has just kicked off. If this project works, it will literally save lives. Save lives. Not observe. Not passive aggressively whine. Save.

Stilgherrian is going to Tanzania for ActionAid Australia. Going is a passive word for what Stil will experience.

Watch and participate in this project. As @fang would say, “I have a feeling in my waters this is going to be important.”

Way, way more important than shilling stuff. Make excuses for organisations. Getting aggro. Eurovisoning. All this fades into dramatic insignificance.

A random thought greater than 140 characters

“The greatest challenge to implementing social media within any organization is the willingness for that organization to accept the cultural change that will ultimately occur. And occur dramatically and at a rapid pace. Social media holds a mirror up to an organization from the external customers/clients/constituents that shows an authentic, and sometimes unexpected, face.”

TEDtalks Ten Commandments for Presenters

Paper notes from #cebitweb

my notes for #cebitweb panel.

Please read, take note and follow. There are a variety of web published sources for these commandments; Laurel Papworth and Tim Longhurst.

Sent to presenters at the TEDTalks conferences, it has much to say to all panelists and presenters.

  1. Thou Shalt Not Simply Trot Out thy Usual Shtick.
  2. Thou Shalt Dream a Great Dream, or Show Forth a Wondrous New Thing, Or Share Something Thou Hast Never Shared Before.
  3. Thou Shalt Reveal thy Curiosity and Thy Passion.
  4. Thou Shalt Tell a Story.
  5. Thou Shalt Freely Comment on the Utterances of Other Speakers for the Sake of Blessed Connection and Exquisite Controversy.
  6. Thou Shalt Not Flaunt thine Ego. Be Thou Vulnerable. Speak of thy Failure as well as thy Success.
  7. Thou Shalt Not Sell from the Stage: Neither thy Company, thy Goods, thy Writings, nor thy Desperate need for Funding; Lest Thou be Cast Aside into Outer Darkness.
  8. Thou Shalt Remember all the while: Laughter is Good.
  9. Thou Shalt Not Read thy Speech.
  10. Thou Shalt Not Steal the Time of Them that Follow Thee.

Thanks to the pink pixie on twitter for posting this list. Very precient. Oh, and I do note the irony of copying and pasting the commandments. I LOL’d too.

Please be respectful of the collective time your audience is investing by listening to you. Think deeply. Listen and learn from others before you copy-and-paste present.

How do you make money from your presentation? Here is a hint. Speak to people after your session, individually. One on one is where the real opportunity for solving a prospect’s problem really lies. And I suggest that more than 80% of any audience you have are not there to buy you, or your products. They want to learn, or just copy-and-paste your ideas.

Time to board the Presentation Cluetrain. And when I fall off, I fully expect you to help put me back aboard.

atNickHodge Episode 11: @zuzu Punk Rock Changed My Life

An excellent ROCKING PUNK ROCK show with Susan MacGillivray (@zuzu on twitter)

A further piece of homework for you all is this 1991 documentary. Also this Bob Rock interview about Vancouver Punk Scene.

OK, I stuffed up the most important thing at the beginning – audio (embarrassing as @fang and I had discussed this earlier in the day); but thankfully deks caught that and I fixed it on the fly. @zuzu was such a great guest: she spent the last 6 days collating data after work ready for the show. And obviously she had plenty of stories to tell.

Another great thing was seeing @zuzu reconnect with her old Vancouver Punk scene friends over the internets.

@zuzu has an excellent post detailing why she chose the following songs in her MIX

To revisit the scene, here are a list of @zuzu’s PICK-and-MIX:

Band Song
Clash Clash City Rockers
Ramones Pinhead
XRay Spex The Day the World Turned Dayglo
Husker Du Whatever
DOA Hardcore 81
The Damned Neat Neat Neat
Young Canadians Hawaii
DOA STATS

Siouxie and the Banshees

Hong Kong Garden
Dead Kennedys Hyperactive child
Joy Division Digital
Germs Manimal
Slow Against the Glass
Descendents I Like Food
Iggy Pop I Wanna Be Your Dog
Modernettes Barbra
The Cramps Tear It Up
Wire Ex Lion Tamer
Rezillos Somebody’s Gonna Get Their Head Kicked in Tonight
Buzzcocks Boredom
Killing Joke Wardance
Minutemen This aint no picnic
Dead Kennedys Holiday in Cambodia
Black Flag Depression (with Ron)
X Jonny Hit and Run Pauline
Stiff Little Fingers Suspect Device

atNickHodge Episode 10: Theology of the Cluetrain with Stephen Collins (@trib)

Show plan for Episode 10, 7th May 2009 #atNickHodge “Theology of the Cluetrain” 
  1. [at 8:35pm] Theology of the Cluetrain 
    1. Introducing our Special Guest this evening, Stephen Collins from AcidLabs (@trib) 
      1. (ask Stephen his background)
      2. long experience in web, html, ux, ia…
      3. which/what event put you onto cluetrain?
    2. Today: #publicsphere
      1. How is the Govt going with this internet/social thing?
      2. are they doing anything at all?
        1. vs. controlled message of previous+current govt
      3. Is @piawaugh‘s addition of Senator Kate Lundy — indicates what; is it an ACT electorate thing? purely political?
      4. “a brave move Minister, open government” / Yes, Minister (first episode)
    3. The Cluetrain Manifesto
      1. 95 theses as a call-to-action / manifesto : business in the internet age
        1. vs. 95 theses of Martin Luther 1517; start of the Protestant Heritage in Europe (vs. Lollards) fighting against the power of the Holy Roman Catholic Church
      2. The manifesto was written in 1999 by Rick Levine, Christopher Locke, Doc Searls, and David Weinberger. 
        1. Pre-dates Web 1.0 (dot-com boom) Web 2.0 (R/W) and Social Media!
          1. Around David Winer, scripting.com (early blogging in 1996/7)
          2. I first met Dave in 1993.
          3. many of these, IT industry specific; aimed at Apple and Microsoft
      3. 8 “sections”
        1. Theses 1 – 6: Markets are Conversations
          – mass media subverted the “village market” .. internet returns us to this concept. Information in markets drives to better stability
          Thesis 7: Hyperlinks Subvert Hierarchy
          – SM: anyone can reach out, outside PR
          Theses 8-13: Connection between the new markets and companies
          – SM: example, mini-microsoft on recent rounds
          Theses 14 – 25: Organizations entering the marketplace
          – ‘voice’ is the culture, fitting in; not attempting to dominate/control
          Theses 26 – 40: Marketing & Organizational Response
          – authenticity
          Theses 41 – 52: Intranets and the impact to organization control and structure
          – fails to understand flow of responsibility; tied to risk/reward
          Theses 53 – 71: Connecting the Internet marketplace with corporate Intranets
          – voice, again in SM context
          Theses 72 – 95: New Market Expectations
          – expectation change
      4. (John C Dvorak) Is it just a Circle-jerk of Burning Man attendees
        1. and left-wing wingnuts?
      5. OK, voices: the voice of government, plainly sucks. PR speak etc. Messages in 15 seconds
      6. where does the need for transparency come from?
    4. what other books/people have you read?
    5. Current “marketing” oriented approach and “p0wnership” needs to be stopped!
      1. Cultural change
        “connected oriented” <———————————-> “conversation oriented”
        platform of “social media” as a replacement to “msm” (traditional media)
      2. Connection oriented is characterised by the number of people that see a viral ad; inserting this into the high end of the SM world, and watching it expand due to the network effect. Getting as many views as possible. No care as to the actual content of the conversation.
         
        Conversation oriented is people oriented; genuine people, conversation .. Cluetrain

        This has its place, but its not “social media” >> cf “Television department” in Mad Men
         
        I am concerned that the “digitial marketing industry” is too much on the left of the above scale as they do not understand customers or employees.
         

It is a whole-of-organisation cultural change.

The disconnect is here.
 

  • It is all “vendors spruiking their wares”?   

  • what is transparency? 100% transparent is impossible; where is the bounds 
    1. concept of reflective transparency: transparency exists outside the organisation, whether you like it or not
  • how does this apply to a non-commercial organisation?
  • http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/01/1533216  
    1. Sun employee documenting top 10 reasons for Sun #fail vs. SEC implications
    2. @wacom @msretail argument vs. MS policy on blogging (vs. SM)
  • Fundamentalist person-oriented social media
    1. partly due to my own success and persona, personality and cult thereof
  • approach to POSM within large organisations
    1. personal brand vs. corporate brand?
  • finding the middle ground
  • [9:24pm] Ending thoughts
    1. Here is the elevator pitch: For as long as an organisation’s products and or services have existed, constituents have been talking. About the products, the price, the service they get; value, ease of dealing with you. Their personal association with the company.And these conversations are across the range from positive or negative. Traditional marketing aims and claims to penetrate the mind, and have influence over these utterances. Sales people argue and negotiate around them, or to reinforce them. PR works with the influencers to influence.
       
      Citizens, constituents and customers are, or have, moved online. Their utterances, or conversations, about you are now visible to millions, if not billions. A search engine search away. We are hyperconnected and hypershare our experiences. Photos, videos or snippets of life compressed into 140 characters. Literally and Instantly. And they are permanent. And they are findable.Of course there are independent voices; voices traditionally called journalists. There are subjective voices in cacophony: SM from the organisation out. A traditional market, if you have visited one, is noisy.
       
      As a representative of your organisation, can choose to listen, or be a part of this conversation, actively choose to block it out. Ignore it. This choice is ultimately yours to make. Like all business decisions, you will need more information to make a rational choice.  Are your constituents online? Is the effort worth the investment?  Can you risk to your reputation by ignoring it?And here is the most frightening question of all: are they talking about you at all?

      The schoolyard and tea kitchen in our officespaces are online, in the clouds of the internet.

      The voices? Can you hear them?